MgO Price Trajectory Analysis and Forecast (H1 2025–2026): From Stability to Structural Shift

1. Introduction

In H12025, China supplied approximately 76% of global MgO exports, reflecting its scale, access to magnesite ore, and large-scale calcination infrastructure. This report analyses China’s export pricing, underlying cost structure, and forecasts pricing trends for H22025 and 2026 based on customs data and energy-and-ore market dynamics.

2. China’s Export Leadership and Competitive Price Advantages

2.1 Raw Material Integration

China controls over 85% of its domestic magnesite reserves—approximately 3.5billion MT—centred in Liaoning and Shandong provinces. These high-grade deposits, often exceeding 46% MgO and accessible via large-scale open-pit operations, ensure feedstock costs remain 18–22% lower than those of import-reliant countries. For example, Israel’s Haifa Group sources magnesite from Turkey and Jordan, incurring substantial cross-border logistics fees, while Brazil’s mines in Minas Gerais require inland transport before export. The vertically integrated supply chain in China—from pit to port—avoids such intermediaries, enhancing cost advantage, especially given MgO's reliance on high-grade ore and energy-intensive calcination.

2.2 Energy and Processing Efficiencies

China’s MgO industry benefits from superior energy optimisation and industrial scale, particularly concentrated in Liaoning and Shandong provinces. Plants in these regions typically deploy advanced rotary kilns with AI-driven thermal control, achieving processing capacities of 1,000–1,200 metric tonnes per day. These kilns maintain stable calcination temperatures above 1,500°C—required for high-grade MgO production—with temperature variation controlled within ±5°C. Coupled with integrated waste-heat recovery systems, these facilities maximize fuel efficiency by preheating incoming magnesite using flue gas streams, reducing total energy input per tonne of MgO produced. According to equipment manufacturers and industrial design firms, such thermal systems deliver energy efficiency gains of approximately 15–20% compared to German counterparts, where plant scales are smaller and environmental retrofitting is more advanced but cost-intensive.

 

Furthermore, China's production clusters benefit from bulk coal procurement and regional power sourcing advantages. In areas such as the Liaoning–Jiangsu corridor, bulk thermal coal procurement contracts allow for average energy input costs in the range of $580–600/MT of MgO output, whereas in Germany, comparable costs exceed $720–750/MT due to reliance on high-cost electricity and regulatory carbon pricing. This cost delta—driven both by input fuel pricing and scale-related energy intensity—translates into a significant price competitiveness advantage for Chinese exporters. It is also worth noting that German plants often face 20–25% higher specific energy consumption per tonne of output, largely due to fragmented production networks and stricter emissions constraints under EU frameworks.

 

2.3 Logistics and Port-Side Throughput

MgO manufacturing clusters in Liaoning and Shandong benefit from immediate access to deep-water ports such as Tianjin and Qingdao, which handle over 8,000MT/day of bulk materials. This streamlined supply chain bypasses inland trucking and rail that burden Brazilian exporters like Magnesita in Minas Gerais—where multimodal logistics can add $20–25/MT to FOB costs. In contrast, Chinese operations handle loading and shipping at port-side plants, with direct pipeline and conveyor connections that sharply reduce both time and cost per tonne. Combined with export rebate schemes (~7–9% of value), Chinese FOB prices remain 10–15% below Brazil, Germany, and Israel.

 

3. H1 2025 Price Volatility: Relative Stability Despite Sectoral Shocks

Despite notable disruptions faced by related sulphate-based fertilisers in early 2025, China’s MgO FOB prices remained unusually stable, fluctuating within a tight ±3% range from January to June—significantly less volatile than historical ranges of ±8–10%.

During this period, China sustained an average plant utilisation rate of 95.3%, with export volumes increasing 5.2% year-on-year to key destinations including Brazil, Indonesia, and Eastern Europe. This balance between steady production and rising demand helped prevent drastic price deviations.

 

Key stabilising factors:

  • A key stabiliser was the stability of input costs. Dolomite ex-factory prices in Shanxi and Liaoning held firm within a stable price range throughout Q1–Q2 2025. Ample inventories and robust production capacity prevented sudden raw material spikes, ensuring cost predictability.
  • Unlike kieserite producers—impacted by safety inspections following plant incidents in regions like Panjin and Yingkou—MgO production was largely unaffected. This is partly due to its reliance on dry, high-temperature calcination processes, which are less intertwined with stringent sulphuric acid or wet chemical controls. The absence of environmental-induced shutdowns meant uninterrupted supply flow.
  • These stable conditions enabled exporters to offer fixed-price quotations mainly for a long period, providing international buyers with rare predictability in a typically fluctuating commodities sector.

 

4. H22025 Key Drivers: Cost Restructuring & Policy Divergence

4.1 Energy Transition & Compliance Costs

Liaoning’s "dual-control" energy and emissions policy targets—reducing coal and carbon intensity—have a differentiated impact on MgO production:

  • Coal-fired reflection kilns (≈35% of local capacity) face mandatory 15–20% output cuts, potentially removing 80,000MT of supply in H22025.
  • Gas-fired suspension roasters (≈65%) operate unaffected.

Switching energy sources introduces approximately 8–10% higher energy costs, per Liaoning Industry and IT Department energy-price indices, partially offset by removing low-efficiency kilns and easing downward pressure on pricing.

4.2 Raw Material Cost Pressure

Dolomite supply bottlenecks have increased local prices with regional differentiation:

Region

Price (RMB/MT)

YoY Change

Impact on 60–92% MgO Costs

Shanxi Wutai

78–128

Stable

~22% of raw material cost

Liaoning Haicheng

130–150

12%

~35% of raw material cost

 

Haicheng supplies ~70% of local mid-purity MgO feedstock; freight premiums raise unit costs further. Dolomite price stability in Shanxi contrasts sharply with increases in coastal Liaoning, per the China Nonferrous Mineral Association

Si-Fe used as reducer a (75# grade) in the Shaanxi market reached 5,600–5,700 RMB/MT (July 2025), with energy price increases pushing its cost share from 18% to 22%.

4.3 Feed‑Grade Demand Push

Revised national "Feed Additive Safety Standards" (effective Sept 2025) reduce permitted Pb in MgO to ≤15ppm (down from 30ppm).
High-grade feed MgO (80–92%) now commands a 5–8% premium, per New Hope Group procurement data, prompting feed producers to pre‑purchase in Q3 and potentially boosting H2 demand by 12–15%.

 

5. 2026 Structural Overhaul: Capacity Retirement & Cost Solidification

5.1 Phasing Out Inefficient Capacity

Under updated 2026 Liaoning standards (2021–2025 industrial plan):

  • Energy intensity cap tightened from ≤450 to ≤380kgce/MT, affecting ≈25% of capacity.
  • Pellet size quality requirement increases from ≥80% to ≥90%, leading to ~180,000MT/year (12%) of small-scale plant closures.

These closures reshape cost dynamics, reduce surplus capacity, and support pricing resilience.

5.2 Seaport Cost Differentiation

Recent Pier Authority updates:

  • Qingdao Port imposed dust surcharges on MgO (+50 RMB/MT, adding ~4% to FOB cost).
  • Dalian Port introduced expedited “green channel” with no surcharges.
    However, Dalian’s limited throughput requires bookings 45 days in advance.

5.3 Feed-Grade Certification Premium

The 2025 change shifted heavy metal testing from quarterly to monthly—adding ~80–100RMB/MT in compliance and testing costs.
Certified feed-grade MgO sales carry sustained 5–8% premiums under GB13078‑2025 standards.

 

6. Price Forecast Model

Period

Forecast Change

Drivers Breakdown

2025H2

+3–5%

Energy costs (40%), feed-grade pull (30%), raw material (30%)

2026

+4–6%

Capacity withdrawal (50%), certification (30%), logistics (20%)

 

 

7. Strategic Recommendations

  • Raw Material Sourcing: Shift towards Shanxi dolomite for a ~18% cost advantage, balancing freight.
  • Processing Alliances: Partner with Dalian-area gas‑fired plants to control energy cost volatility.
  • Certification Uplift: Complete GB13078‑2025 feed-grade certification by Q32025 ahead of demand surge.
Contact Us

If you have any questions, please fill in the relevant information. We are very willing to provide more information and a full range of services for both you and your company.

  • Tel+86-573-82801502
  • E-mailsales@chinesekieserite.com
  • AddressNo. 362 Fuxing Road, Jiaxing, 314000, Zhejiang, China